Final Jeopardy: Geography Words (6-21-22)

Here are some more triple stumpers from then 6/21/2022 Jeopardy! game. Please don’t put the answers to these clues in the comments so people who missed the game can have a chance to answer them. It is okay to refer to them by category and clue value or by part of the clue.

RED ALL OVER ($400) There’s a red in the name of this gravest type of transgression in Catholic theology

($1000) This word for red wine, now especially Bordeaux wine, can also mean a reddish color

TAKING STOCK SYMBOL ($400) BB, securing your data in a nice, safe Canadian way

TV FACTOIDS ($200) With a knack for predicting plays, he’s been a success in the broadcast booth like he was behind center

3 LETTERS IN A ROW, ALPHABETICALLY ($400) It’s the 2-word family relationship you have with the child of your mom’s brother

($1000) It’s where a river’s mouth meets the ocean

I DON’T HEAR A SYMPHONY ($2000) A bit like a symphony, the first work called this “for Orchestra” instead of for a solo instrument was in 1925 by Hindemith

“M.R.”, AYE! ($1200) During World War II, Winston Churchill planned strategy in this aptly named space; you can still visit it

The Daily Box Scores are released at 8 pm Eastern

Sneak Peek clues — KIDS’ BOOKS
($200) Despite his mother’s warning, this title character does get into mischief, eating from Mr. McGregor’s garden
($400) The title character of this classic by Eric Carle literally eats through the pages of the book
($600) This stuffed bear with a fabric name goes searching for a missing button
($800) She is the smallest of the 12 girls who live in a vine-covered house in Paris
($1000) This 2-word title of Chelsea Clinton’s book about determined women was coined by Sen. McConnell about Sen. Warren

ANSWERS: show

We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases made from Amazon.com links at no cost to our visitors. Learn more: Affiliate Disclosure.

Share

You may also like...

19 Responses

  1. Jason says:

    That Sporcle quiz was a little delayed. I mention this specifically because I got Grenada wrong (when I didn’t), because I did my first two years of med school there!

  2. Howard says:

    Megan’s FJ wagering is usually brilliant and strategic. Today she knew she had to be right to win and hope the other two crashed. She wrote down her response instantly, so I knew she’d nailed it. I sure couldn’t come up with it. Other than the Catholic sin and the NFL broadcaster, the stumpers got me too. Three wins by $2; has to be a first.

    That was darn good competition today. When all 3 started out in the red, it looked bleak.

  3. Jason says:

    That first round was absolutely atrocious. I was thinking that it might be a waste of my time.

    Jenny was refreshing, because she wasn’t afraid to show emotion, and was just cute!

    What does Ken say in those contestant commercials? “…A chance to win a lot of money”. Good for Megan to squeak out another win, but, to what end? She has her spot in the TOC. And, as someone else said, she seemed genuinely surprised that she won. Sure, there was some canny wagering, but, I would not go nuts saying how brilliant she is. Winning Jeopardy! by knowing final when others don’t is a strategy, but, not reliable. You know what is another, more reliable strategy? Answer more clues than your opponents, and betting more. That was eminently successful for James, and he never looked surprised that he won.

    The daytime TV host, had the pic been of her wearing her signature huge hoop earrings, I wonder if someone might have gotten it.

    • Jason says:

      And I got FJ! correct.

    • VJ says:

      I was rooting for Jenny after she got that first DD right. Her reaction was adorable.

      I wouldn’t have known that TV host if she had hoop earrings and a sign with her name behind her. I thought that was the name of a place. smh

  4. Rick says:

    Why do they keep using Greek words as the clue in FJ as they’re just plain useless? I mean, virtually no one in the states speaks Greek.

    • JP says:

      I don’t think the clue writers are expecting the contestants to speak Greek, and you need not know a thing about the Greek language to have solved this clue.

      But even if you don’t speak Greek, many English words have Greek roots that contestants can reasonably be expected to know, and the last two clues were will with in bounds asking about fairly common stems in English words with a Greek origin.

      I thought they were both great clues, and the part of the clue today referencing the Greek roots taught me something interesting.

  5. Louis Jin says:

    Unbelievable that Megan won the game again by 2 dollars. I guess she has luck or something. Maybe that necklace has helped her a lot.

  6. Jacob Ska says:

    Megan is absolutely brilliant. Most people measure brilliant in dollar amount won in a short period of time. I look at brilliant in terms of strategy and longevity. The ability to win consistently. Most people are impatient and Don’t think things through before making a move. They depend on luck. Luck is sporadic. Megan simple math strategy is absolutely brilliant. She’s a careful thinker.

    Imo Megan figured Rob had to cover himself in case Jenny doubled up. Megan calculated her amount to wager, I think, just in case Rob was incorrect so she (Megan) could win. Hence winning by $2. Brilliant!

    Since Rob & Jenny were leading going into fj they figured they would be correct and Megan would be history. Bad strategic thinking. Never underestimate your opponent’s strategic move.

    • VJ says:

      @Jacob, I’m just wondering why, esp yesterday and today, she was so blown away when she won. I mean, that’s obviously what she was aiming for.

      idk, maybe she’s expecting her luck to run out?

      • Jacob Ska says:

        VJ, that’s easy to understand. In Business we call it “hedging your bets.” She could not know with certainty that her opponents would be wrong but she wagered in a way that she would win by a small margin if they wagered more aggressively which they did. Having some insight into human behavior feeds into it too. Don’t forget she has 4 college degrees. One in Mathematics (undergrad) & a Master’s degree in Philosophy (University of Cambridge). She is risk averse imo based upon her background training. Most people think just Lawyer with her but she also has a Ph.D. in Philosophy which leans heavily on logic.

        • VJ says:

          Thanks, Jacob 😀

        • Jason says:

          James Holzhauer has a degree in math, and two words never ascribed to him are “risk averse”.

        • Jacob Ska says:

          Jason, Of course James is not risk averse. That’s why he moved to Las Vegas as a professional gambler. 😂😂 He doesn’t hold advanced degrees in Philosophy or Law either. You’re mixing things up here my friend. No comparison can be made between these two individuals.

      • Jacob Ska says:

        Btw, VJ, I forgot to mention she’s done this without many, if any, daily doubles coming her way. This is clearly a lesson in strategy and survival. I’ve never seen anything like it on Jeopardy even during the days of Art Fleming. This is clearly an unusual season in Jeopardy history.

  7. Kevin Cheng says:

    For the third game in a row, Megan wins by a margin of $2. Unbelievable, her luck keeps going well for her. That makes it 5 games in a row that she comes from behind to win the game.

    • VJ says:

      Kevin, Megan had a runaway on 6/15, so it’s 4 games in a row that she came from behind. The games she won by $2 were Games 1, 3 and 6.

      • Kevin Cheng says:

        Oh right I didn’t knew that. I think that this is a little mistake. Megan won from first place in her 2nd game then 4 games later she won from behind and if you remember on her 4th game she won that game after her opponent’s FJ response was not completed in time.

        • VJ says:

          Kevin, I don’t know what mistake you are referring to but this is Megan’s 6th game. So it should be easy for you to figure out that she could not have won from behind 5 games in a row. (Hint: in a row is the mistake)