Final Jeopardy: 1980s Movies (3-16-23)
Today’s Final Jeopardy question (3/16/2023) in the category “1980s Movies” was:
A writer & producer of this movie said he wanted it to be like a western or James Bond film, “only it takes place in the ’30s”
4x champ Stephen Webb, a data scientist from Longmont, CO, has now won $175,282. In Game 8, his opponents are: Andrew Brady, a leadership development consultant from Rochester, NY; and Sarah Matthews, a middle school teacher from Loxahatchee, FL.
Round 1 Categories: Comic Influences – World Universities – Love, in So Many Words – Hear “Ye”, Hear Ye – The Leader Before the Leader – What Kind of Fowl Am I?
Sarah found the Jeopardy! round Daily Double in “Love, In So Many Words” under the $800 clue, with 10 clues left after it. She was tied in the lead with Stephen at $4,600, Andrew was $400 in the red. Sarah bet $3,000 and she was RIGHT.
In a play, this title character says, “Ah, credulity of love! Roxane will think each word inspired by herself!” show
Sarah finished in the lead with $9,000. Stephen was second with $8,000. Andrew was last with negative $400. All clues were shown.
Round 2 Categories: U.S. Islands – The “A”rts – Food Stuff – Letter Perfect – Scientific Laws & Theorems – A Heavenly Body in Music
Sarah found the first Daily Double in “Islands” under the $400 clue on the 9th pick of the round. She was in second place with $7,800, $6,200 less than Stephen’s lead. Sarah bet $5,000 and she was RIGHT.
Despite its name this island doesn’t actually have any wineries, but there are a couple of liquor stores in Edgartown show
Sarah got the last Daily Double in “A Heavenly Body in Music” under the $1,600 clue with one clue to go after it. In second place with $15,600, she had $8,200 less than Stephen’s lead. Sarah bet $4,000 and she was RIGHT.
This singer also from northern lands recorded “The Comet Song” for a film based on Finland’s beloved Moomin books show
Stephen finished in the lead with $22,400. Sarah was second with $17,600. At negative $2,000, Andrew was out of the game at this point. All clues were shown.
NEITHER contestant left in Final Jeopardy! got it right.
WHAT IS “RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK”?
Dr. Henry Walton “Indiana” Jones, Jr. is the protagonist of the 1981 blockbuster “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and its sequels, collectively known as the Indiana Jones franchise. The idea for “Indy” came from a conversation between Steven Spielberg and George Lucas. Wikipedia’s “biography” of Indy covers just about everything that is known about the character. From the Origins and Inspirations section: “The two friends first discussed the project in Hawaii…. Spielberg told Lucas how he wanted his next project to be something fun, like a James Bond film (this would later be referenced when they cast Sean Connery as Henry Jones, Sr.).” Lucas shared what he thought was a better idea.
This info is also covered in one of many trivia entries for “Raiders of the Lost Ark” on IMDB. Another trivia item to take note of on there: “Raiders of the Lost Ark” is the only Indiana Jones film to be nominated for a Best Picture Oscar.
Sarah came up with 1976’s “Bugsy Malone”. She lost $15,000 and finished with $2,600.
Stephen went with “Top Secret” though I’m not sure which one he meant. He lost $12,801. That left him with $9,599, enough to win today. Stephen now has an 8-day total of $184,881.
A triple stumper from each round:
LOVE, IN SO MANY WORDS ($1000) You can detect this novelist wrote, “Nora said: ‘I love you, Nicky, because you smell nice and know such fascinating people'”
U.S. ISLANDS ($1600) Named for a Spanish viceroy, not a bunch of whales, it’s the largest of Washington State’s San Juan Islands
2 years ago: Only ONE of the players got this FJ in “Foreign Newspapers”:
Representing its outspoken tone, this newspaper founded in the 19th century has the name of a free-spirited opera character
IF YOU HAVE SUGGESTIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE SHOW OR COMPLAINTS, PLEASE SEND YOUR FEEDBACK DIRECTLY TO JEOPARDY!
We may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases made from Amazon.com links at no cost to our visitors. Learn more: Affiliate Disclosure.
To show my age, I remember clearly as if it were yesterday when Merv Griffin selected Alex Trebek to host Jeopardy. He said he selected him because of his background in hosting game shows and his knowledge base. If I remember his comments correctly when being interviewed he said Alex Trebek cannot be compared to Art Fleming. Fast forward to Ken Jennings hosting Jeopardy. To attempt to compare him to Alex Trebek is grossly unfair imo. I may be wrong but this is Mr. Jennings first time hosting a game show. He may not have the experience hosting but he sure has the knowledge.
I also remember reading somewhere on this website that complaints about the show should be sent directly to Jeopardy. Yes I am a Ken Jennings fan.
Well, Jacob, I wasn’t comparing Ken to Alex to begin with. It does say to send complaints on every recap but this was not a complaint about the show in my mind. I just don’t think it’s right to point out other people’s weaknesses right in front of their faces.
VJ, I was offering a counterpoint to comments posted. I hope a counterpoint is allowed since Ken Jennings is a neophyte in game show hosting. We all innocently make mistakes in that all important first career path and learn from them when given a chance to grow…hopefully.
Sure, counterpoints are allowed, Jacob. And your point that Alex Trebek’s experience when he began hosting the show was far superior to Ken’s is certainly valid.
I just didn’t see this as a matter of inexperience. Still don’t.
Did anyone else think the final answer was Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
I racked my brain for Final, but came up with The Untouchables. Ironically, I knew that Raiders was supposed to harken back to serials of the 30s (like in The Temple of Doom, when the mine rail car jumps, and ends up directly, squarely on the tracks). Don’t know why it didn’t click.
I don’t know how much leeway the host has to compose their opening remarks, but even if the intent is to give the challengers hope, Ken’s remarks do seem to be in bad form. I really don’t recall Alex pointing out a winner’s shortcomings on multiple days. Ken is my favorite host but I find this disappointing.
I’m glad you agree, Sam. He’s basically telling the challengers “Here’s this guy’s weaknesses”.
When Alex was the host, a big deal was made out of the multiple game winners, even on the day s/he lost. I was fine with that except on the last day at the end of the game. They don’t have to overdo it, but the returning champ deserves the opening props regardless of how the game was won.
And we got a double stumper as we got another tough final.
For the fourth day in a row this week, Stephen has managed to win the game despite not finding any Daily Doubles. Is he not going to find any daily doubles or will he finally found one to wrap up the week? We’ll see what happens tomorrow. Sarah could have won if she only bet small but she overbet and Stephen won the game.
I suppose we’ll hear Ken tell tomorrow’s challengers how many FJ’s Stephen got wrong this week and how he can be beaten right in front of Stephen again. Maybe it’s just me, but I find that to be in bad form. Incredibly rude!
Agreed. He’s supposedly trying to give the challengers hope, but it comes off as critical and condescending.
Sarah should have known that she could win the game only if Stephen erred on FJ, and that he likely would wager $12801. So her wager should have been $4801, eventually ensuring a win. She was a strong player who could have had a five-figure win and a return visit.